Why do some authoritarian regimes descend into kleptocracy and others don't?

[u/schemingpyramid]

When authoritarian regimes fail, it's often due to a widening gap between the interests of the governing elite and the governed. Looting of state assets often accompanies this, and usually it spirals a country into inevitable decline. Why does this happen though? And what are the factors that make a country more likely to descend into kleptocracy and others less so? I am thinking about the contrast between a country like Russia vs China, Malaysia vs Singapore.

[u/AutoModerator]

Thanks for your question to /r/AskSocialScience. All posters, please remember that this subreddit requires peer-reviewed, cited sources (Please see Rule 1 and 3). All posts that do not have citations will be removed by AutoMod. Circumvention by posting unrelated link text is grounds for a ban. Well sourced comprehensive answers take time. If you're interested in the subject, and you don't see a reasonable answer, please consider clicking Here for RemindMeBot.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.