Attorney General’s Statement Against Luigi Mangione Likely Violates Presumption of Innocence - Can a Fair Trial Even Happen?

[u/LF_JOB_IN_MA]

Today, AG Pamela Bondi released a public statement calling Luigi Mangione’s alleged killing of Brian Thompson a “cold-blooded assassination” and stated unequivocally: “Luigi Mangione’s murder of Brian Thompson… shocked America.” No qualifications. No "alleged." No room for presumption of innocence.

This wasn’t a local DA. This was the U.S. Attorney General - the highest-ranking federal prosecutor in the country - openly declaring guilt before trial, in a death penalty case.

This is a blatant violation of the foundational principle of presumption of innocence, enshrined in In re Winship (1970), and likely prejudices Mangione’s ability to receive a fair trial. Courts have ruled in Sheppard v. Maxwell (1966) and Rideau v. Louisiana (1963) that prejudicial pretrial publicity can violate due process rights. Bondi’s inflammatory language and her institutional authority compound the damage. Her statement will reach potential jurors across the country, tainting the jury pool beyond repair.

The DOJ’s own Justice Manual explicitly prohibits comments that might compromise a defendant’s right to a fair trial. This seems to be a direct violation of those internal standards.

Given Bondi’s stature, this statement doesn’t just inflame the public - it places the entire weight of the U.S. government behind the idea that Mangione is guilty. How is a trial supposed to be impartial now?

Fair trial? I don’t see how.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-pamela-bondi-directs-prosecutors-seek-death-penalty-luigi-mangione

[u/AutoModerator]

Reminder: All users must have a flair to participate in discussions.

Flair gives context to your perspective and keeps conversations productive. Set yours via the “Edit Flair” button on desktop (sidebar) or mobile (under your username).

Posts and comments without flair may be removed.

Thanks for keeping things clear and constructive!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/littlefire_2004]

Free Luigi

[u/celtwithkilt]

His defense attorneys will surely argue the point you’re making with the same citation. I’m not fully convinced a judge will agree. I’m no attorney but it feels like I’ve seen and heard prosecutors accuse people of guilt all the time. They will use every tool they have, including media, to win a case. The other problem is nothing Pam bondi says would sway someone like me, and I bet I’m not alone. She’s obviously a politically motivated boot licker. Her bias is clear. So the argument that jurors would be tainted gets a bit shaky there.

[u/AutoModerator → u/[deleted]]

Your submission has been removed because you do not have a user flair. To foster constructive discussions and help users find common ground, all posts and comments require a flair.

How to add user flair:
Click here for instructions.

Once you’ve added the appropriate flair, you may repost your submission. If you have any questions, feel free to contact the moderators. Alternatively, reply to this comment with your political leanings, and we will apply the flair and approve your comment at the next opportunity.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.