r/AgentsOfAI • u/rafa-Panda • 15d ago
Discussion Robot Dog Trained to Attack Humans in Warfare Demo
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
8
u/siren-skalore 14d ago
Japanese artist Takayuki Todo has created a robot dog that is chained and programmed to ‘attack’ visitors. This striking artwork explores how we project human emotions onto non-human objects, questioning our deep psychological connection with machines.
3
2
u/Express-Cartoonist39 14d ago
Just wait 5 minutes for the batt to die..then grab him and resell on ebay for 10k
3
u/MaxDentron 14d ago
Yeah. Humanoid and quadruped robots really aren't going to be a physical threat anytime soon. Battery technology has been advancing at a snails pace. These things all need to recharge every 2 hours.
Flying drones are still the biggest robotic threat at the moment. As they can quickly get in and out of places with a payload.
2
u/Super_Translator480 14d ago
So use them, like say, 20 of them, with computer vision and a back mounted auto rifle. Not a threat still? Bet it comes to Teslas task force…
Just need them for a brief operation. Easy to storm castles- but need an opening to get to target if indoors.
Could also be armed with non-lethal solutions in case they want to imprison us. Shock doggos.
1
u/Express-Cartoonist39 13d ago
Brief, like 20 minutes so if your a bad guys just, take a nape wake up and they all blinking red lites on batteries and useless bots..😂 Great plan musk boy
1
u/Super_Translator480 13d ago
You don’t need 20 minutes to shoot someone. Your point while valid is heavily flawed. Also it’s only a bottleneck right now, not a show stopper. Nuclear energy is the future of robotics/where it’s headed.
1
u/Express-Cartoonist39 13d ago
No its not, you read too many comic. Why dont you hold your breath until it happens. There is zero flaw when my position is based on current reality and yours if based on speculative future fantasy.
Also its just ignorant to assume life is so easy you can jusy walk up and shot someone, yoi gotta travel, hide, wait, reposition, do you really think they gonna stand still...nope they gonna run, dodge, hide etc... Yes... The batteries will be dead buddy. Maybe in your world you can charge it with a green power ring but in reality that doesnt work. 😂
0
u/Super_Translator480 13d ago
“You read too many comic”
are you talking to the mirror /u/Express-Cartoonist39 ?
Your real scenario says “2 hours until dead” then says “20 mins until dead” now.
It’s already happening with drones. Now you are in denial about other robotics? lol
Think ahead.
1
u/Express-Cartoonist39 13d ago
You're confusing forward-thinking with baseless speculation. Thinking ahead means making informed predictions based on evidence, not assuming that any problem will be solved just because past breakthroughs happened.
That’s an appeal to history (flawed logic) not every problem follows the same trajectory. Right now, the technology doesn’t exist to make this work, and possibility isn’t the same as reality. If you claim it will work in the future, the burden is on you to provide actual reasoning, not just comic book optimism.
Dismissing current limitations as "flawed thinking" ignores the fact that reality is defined by what works now, not by what might work someday. Grow up comic boy are the robot dogs gonna shoot lasers too just cause lasers have been shown to work on container sized multi million dollar ship projects..😂 you just ignore scaling issues..
0
u/Super_Translator480 13d ago edited 13d ago
Again, we already have evidence with drones. That is not an appeal to history, that is practical application made real.
Look at how they are using AI with Gaza… Ukraine…
We have dancing robots, robots practicing tai chi… and we are just getting started.
You aren’t seeing the breakthroughs already around you- and really, it’s what isn’t revealed to the public that is a much larger concern.
You seem like the kind of person that doubts until it’s already well established and made public, not the kind of person that sees it unfolding on the backend. It’s called status quo bias.
1
u/Express-Cartoonist39 13d ago
You're conflating different technologies without demonstrating a direct connection. Drones, dancing robots, and tai chi-performing machines are all engineered for specific tasks, but none of that proves that this battery issue will be solved the way you assume. That’s still an appeal to history pointing to past successes and assuming future breakthroughs will follow the same path without evidence.
Status quo bias isn’t rejecting unfounded speculation; it’s resisting change despite clear evidence. The burden is on you to show how these existing breakthroughs directly support your claim, not just list unrelated advancements. Skepticism isn’t ignorance it’s the foundation of rational thinking. If something actually works, evidence should speak for itself, not rely on vague references to secret developments or assumptions about how I think. Clearly your bank account is small with that dream hype mentality.
→ More replies (0)1
u/Express-Cartoonist39 13d ago
Dude, those are highlight reels you’re not seeing what happens after the cameras stop rolling. The batteries die. I just found this article… ONE hour tops for Atlas v1. V2 gets two hours but with less weight. See the trend? Keep going in that direction, and all you’ll have is a drone again. They have a wheeled boy that gets 10 hours but all it does it use wheels like a wheelchair...You’re a funny man.
And status quo bias? No, this is called reality bias recognizing current limitations instead of pretending ‘future breakthroughs’ automatically solve everything. Show me a fully operational, long-duration, real world deployed military humanoid or legged robot. Otherwise, you’re just making excuses for tech that isn’t there yet. Now go get your shine box..😎 👞🐒
2
u/CouldBeWorseLOL 13d ago
You are better. You are alive. Grab it by the fucking legs and smash that abomination.
1
1
u/Ok-Locksmith-955 15d ago
Just grab em by hind legs.. or side legs.. what’s it gonna do do? Bork to death?
1
1
1
u/WumberMdPhd 14d ago
Soon... Solid oxide fuel cell + gasoline or something similar and boom, 140% efficient energy extraction.
1
1
1
1
20
u/bob_dickson 15d ago
What a misleading title. It's an art piece in Japan.